Social preferences and lying aversion in children
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Would I Lie To You? On Social Preferences and Lying Aversion∗
This paper reinterprets the evidence on lying or deception presented in Gneezy (2005, American Economic Review). We show that Gneezy’s data are consistent with the simple hypothesis that people are one of two kinds: either a person will never lie, or a person will lie whenever she prefers the outcome obtained by lying over the outcome obtained by telling the truth. This implies that so long as ...
متن کاملLying aversion and prosocial behaviour
The opportunity to tell a white lie (i.e., a lie that benefits another person) generates a moral conflict between two opposite moral dictates, one pushing towards telling always the truth and the other pushing towards helping others. Here we study how people resolve this moral conflict. What does telling a white lie signal about a person’s pro-social tendencies? To answer this question, we cond...
متن کاملdomestication and foreignization in children literature translation
این پایان نامه به بررسی بومی سازی و بیگانه سازی در ادبیات کودکان مخصوصا زانر فانتزی می پردازد. در این پایان نامه ترجمه 14 کتاب داستان فانتزی برای سه گروه سنی کودکان بر اساس مدل ونوتی یعنی بومی سازی و بیگانه سازی مقاسه شدندکه در نتیجه برای سه گروه سنی از هر دو استراتزی توسط مترجمان در ترجمه کلمات فرهنگی استفاده شده است.
Social Influences on Inequity Aversion in Children
Adults and children are willing to sacrifice personal gain to avoid both disadvantageous and advantageous inequity. These two forms of inequity aversion follow different developmental trajectories, with disadvantageous inequity aversion emerging around 4 years and advantageous inequity aversion emerging around 8 years. Although inequity aversion is assumed to be specific to situations where res...
متن کاملWarfare and Social Preferences in Children
Social preferences-such as altruism, aversion to inequality and strong reciprocity-are critical for the maintenance of cooperation 1-3. Although pro-social individuals make their groups do better as a whole, they are vulnerable to exploitation by selfish free-riders. Wars between groups have been hypothesized as an important catalyst of human pro-sociality since Darwin 4. Recent theories 5 have...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Experimental Economics
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1386-4157,1573-6938
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-015-9459-7